Archeological Interactive Reports, AIR
Archeological Interactive Reports, AIR
UI/UX research, graphic design
UI/UX research, graphic design
UX research evaluating archeology platform, explaining findings through design.
Process
Process
Evaluating platform through future studies
Evaluating platform through future studies
UX Research
UX Research
Future studies
Future studies
Graphic design
Graphic design
Overall design method used in this project was a double diamond. The project started by identifying two different future studies techniques, backcasting and scenario planning. Through interviews a desirable future was found, and a how might we question created. "How might we make the AIR platform more accessible and encourage interactivity for new archeology students". With this problem statement the current platform was evaluated using Laws of UX practices. To explain the findings 3 posters were created by firstly making a moodboard and creating archeologically themed posters to fit the target audience.
Overall design method used in this project was a double diamond. The project started by identifying two different future studies techniques, backcasting and scenario planning. Through interviews a desirable future was found, and a how might we question created. "How might we make the AIR platform more accessible and encourage interactivity for new archeology students". With this problem statement the current platform was evaluated using Laws of UX practices. To explain the findings 3 posters were created by firstly making a moodboard and creating archeologically themed posters to fit the target audience.
The first picture shows the moodboard created for the project. Second image shows how the future studies scenario planning was conducted. Lastly the third image shows the results of evaluating the platform
The first picture shows the moodboard created for the project. Second image shows how the future studies scenario planning was conducted. Lastly the third image shows the results of evaluating the platform
